So the default is the sheriff of Nottingham performing the maximum shakedown possible?AB - Alim Büyücü wrote: ↑Mon Mar 22, 2021 9:12 amI think the real problem isn't the law holdings. It's the norms we have developed around using them. I have argued before that law claims should be automatic, and that the default should be that trade routes begin with a 50% tax rate and should take a decree to change.
And trade routes make 0% profit by default? 50% for regent A then 50% for rengent B? A seasonal loss equal to ship maintenance to even run that route?
If I ever played a guild under those conditions, I would have to charge a punitive price for access to resources transported along that route.